Showdown within the Oval Workplace over border wall
Re: “Trump threatens shutdown…” Dec. 12 information story
The Trump administration is a unbroken collection of head fakes, making an attempt to show the general public consideration away from the newest failure, and towards one thing Trump can declare as a monumental victory.
The funding shutdown is not any totally different, Trump has already publicly introduced it doesn’t matter what occurs, if the Democrats don’t knuckle beneath, and provides him what he needs, he’ll shut the federal government down and blame them.
The president needs his wall funded,and despite the fact that Mexico isn’t going to pay for it, (yet one more failed marketing campaign lie he knew was false when he stated it), he needs it proper now.
Democrats can be unwise to roll over to Trump — having already provided $1.2 billion towards the wall was a conciliatory and affordable gesture. I say to the Democratic management, let him do it, and make it possible for the general public is aware of the reality of why he did it.
Thomas M. Holzfaster, Lakewood
For President Obama, the federal government might provide you with $150 billion in money and have it flown to Iran. The Democrats are unwilling to provide President Trump $5 billion for a border wall.
Type of makes you marvel the place the federal government’s priorities are, $150 billion to the best sponsor of terrorism on the planet however no $5 billion to assist stem the circulate of unlawful medicine and attempt to maintain terrorists out of the USA, in addition to implement authorized immigration.
Obama didn’t need to shut down the federal government to get $150 billion for Iran. Will Trump should strong-arm the federal government to get the $5 billion he needs?
John Dellinger, Aurora
Ready for the fallout – or not – of Mueller probe
If ever there’s to be a tipping level relating to Trump help amongst Republican elected officers and celebration “leaders,” it should come solely when there’s a drop in Trump’s approval scores to the 30 % or much less degree (as measured by a number of polls and trending over a interval of weeks a minimum of). Their Faustian discount with Trump can by no means permit abandonment of fealty to him till they’re satisfied that their very own well-being requires it, the nation’s pursuits however.
The repellent and astonishing degree of Profiles in Cowardice won’t simply disintegrate. However, ought to that point of broad widespread Trump rejection ever arrive, I consider it’s going to resemble a breached dam exhibiting first a trickle adopted by a deluge.
J. Riley, Westminster
I feel the one floodgates which were opened with the discharge of particular counsel Robert Mueller’s report are these of anger on the a part of many People towards the continued efforts of Mueller and his group to derail this presidency and to threaten sufficient of Trump’s former associates with jail time in the event that they don’t take a plea in trade for saying precisely what Mueller needs to listen to. Two holdouts courageous sufficient to not succumb are Paul Manafort and Jerome Corsi. Anybody who has listened to what went on within the Corsi interrogations ought to be very afraid of what’s passing for “justice” within the higher ranks of the FBI today.
In the meantime, Mueller’s rigorously chosen workforce of Democratic legal professionals, a few of whom donated to Hillary Clinton’s marketing campaign, proceed to disregard her half in paying for the pretend Steele file, which was then used to acquire FISA warrants, even when Christopher Steele himself couldn’t corroborate its validity. I’d like to see The Denver Post dedicate some area to those revelations.
Karen Libby, Denver
It stays to be seen whether or not Trump may be instantly tied to a “conspiracy” for a overseas authorities — Russia — to aim to affect the 2016 election and whether or not there’s an impeachable offense that may end in two-thirds of the Senate voting to take away him from workplace amongst any of this. Regardless, current occasions have confirmed past a shadow of a doubt that this president is a pathological liar to his personal profit and can’t be trusted to inform the American public the reality.
That could be very disconcerting since within the occasion of a big nationwide menace or emergency, which isn’t out of the query in our weakened and divided state, many people would ponder whether he was doing something however making an attempt to change the headlines and he would have a troublesome time rallying the nation to his proposed plan of action towards stated menace.
That’s really the hazard we face at this second, and for that cause one of the best plan of action can be for him to spare the nation additional humiliation and hazard and resign.
John W. Thomas, Fort Collins
For these too younger to have lived via Watergate, take coronary heart that you simply get a chance to expertise historical past in real-time now. Watergate took two years to completely unfold, between the 1972 break-in and the 1974 Nixon resignation.
We watched all this in a time earlier than TV entertainers masquerading as journalists or avenues for mass misinformation existed. Sit again and cherish these moments of sluggish however regular reveal. Keep in mind, the crimes and occasions have already occurred.
Identical to in Watergate, the story is within the journey of investigation and discovery. The greatest solution to watch this historic novel play out is two-fold: brief, boring, however principally impartial summaries from the nightly information anchors on the three conventional networks adopted up with extra evaluation and in-depth main newspaper reporting. In all these years two issues stay the identical — the corruption of energy by fallible people and the worth of sluggish and regular reporting from our trusted information sources.
Norman Davey, Centennial
Placing heads collectively on climate change options
In studying final Sunday’s paper on the varied penalties of climate change, I used to be reminded of parallel reactions on the micro degree: When an organism turns into sick with an infection, its protection is to supply a fever to kill the invading organism. So, too, earth’s rising temperature will destroy the organism which threatens it. Humanity has an uncanny capacity to put short-term achieve over the long-term well being of our planet. Maybe that is our species’ deadly flaw.
Don Batt, Denver
The Sunday Post articles and letters about climate change and environmental degradation make me consider that Thomas Malthus was proper, not within the particular sense (meals shortage) however general. There are too many people to maintain us alive and the planet wholesome. We’d like low-carbon power. We have to have higher safety of the surroundings. However we actually want much less of us. We’re fouling our personal nest.
Voluntary inhabitants management efforts are being discouraged. We don’t promote household planning, voluntary contraception and, when needed, protected, authorized abortion. As an alternative of serving to these efforts, our authorities is chopping funding and availability.
These actions are based mostly on a perceived, unquestioned ethical basis. I might recommend that a rising inhabitants would be the underlying reason for elevated warfare, pestilence and famine sooner or later. Is that ethical?
John W. Lacher, M.D., Denver
Re: “Republicans should want a carbon tax,” Dec. 2 commentary
A carbon payment and dividend is just not solely good for our surroundings and a livable world, however it additionally makes financial sense. Renewable power sources are the best way of the longer term and make monetary sense as nicely. The excuses have to cease as we’re operating out of time to deal with climate change. It’s constructive to see that there’s some understanding with the introduction of the Power Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act. Climate change must be solved by people on each side of the aisle. I hope and pray that extra members of each events get on board to deal with this critical challenge.
Alexx Hoholik, Denver
Re: “Climate change clobbering Colorado and western U.S.,” Dec. 2 information story
Wildfires burn, bugs eat timber, water provides dwindle, snowpacks shrink. Bruce Finley’s in-depth reporting describes the present-day penalties of our warming west, leaving us to ask: What can we do about it?
The Power Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act, launched by three Republicans and three Democrats places a charge on hydrocarbon manufacturing, thereby decreasing demand for carbon-based fuels. The funds collected shall be despatched as a dividend to every family within the nation, spurring demand for different types of power. This intelligent concept deserves the help of Colorado representatives and senators. They should know that you simply assume so too.
Phil Nelson, Golden
On Black Friday, the Nationwide Climate Evaluation was issued by the White Home. The report signaled that it’s crucial we scale back carbon emissions and modernize our electrical energy grid. And one avenue? A politically unbiased company referred to as the Federal Power Regulatory Fee. FERC’s selections have lasting impacts on our wallets, our surroundings, and our climate. For some states similar to Colorado, maintaining the power market truthful and controlled has brought about the wind market to soar and the financial system in that sector to growth.
Just lately, the integrity of the FERC has come underneath assault by President Trump’s nomination of Bernard McNamee to go the FERC. McNamee has illustrated his favoritism in the direction of the coal business by his previous makes an attempt to bail out these failing industries. McNamee additionally has no regulatory expertise or expertise within the electrical utility business. The lack of qualification and blatant bias towards fossil fuels will cloud his judgment which can depart the shoppers and ratepayers weak.
As Coloradans, we urge Sen. Cory Gardner to vote NO on McNamee’s nomination. Sooner or later, we additionally urge him to maintain the FERC a politically unbiased company and get up for Colorado’s burgeoning wind business.
Amanda Koch, Fort Collins
To ship a letter to the editor about this text, submit on-line or take a look at our tips for how you can submit by e mail or mail.