Barack Obama Congress construction Content Deaths disaster Donald Trump Economy election electricity FEMA George W. Bush Great Recession Hurricane Harvey Hurricane Katrina Hurricane Maria hurricanes Latest News Marco Rubio middle class Mike Pence National Politics Paul Ryan Politics Puerto Rico recovery South Dakota White House

Donald Trump distorts facts on Hurricane Maria death tolls

Donald Trump distorts facts on Hurricane Maria death tolls

WASHINGTON — In a stormy week, President Donald Trump blustered and distorted actuality, denying large deaths from a hurricane that scientists consider to be one of many nation’s deadliest and blowing out of proportion U.S. financial progress and his position in spurring it.

He’s insisting the federal response to Hurricane Maria, which hit Puerto Rico final September, was “incredibly successful,” although blackouts there stay widespread and a number of other types of federal help have been sluggish to reach in contrast with previous disasters. Unbiased researchers have estimated the death toll was almost three,000 individuals. Trump is rejecting that work, claiming it’s a conspiracy by Democrats and isn’t true.

And because the November elections close to, Trump is citing record-breaking middle-class revenue that isn’t so and exaggerating progress on his long-promised wall alongside the U.S.-Mexico border.

On the similar time, a few of Trump’s critics weren’t totally immune from hyperbole.

Former President Barack Obama asserted “healthy” financial progress throughout his administration that’s in dispute and a Democratic lawmaker blamed all of the estimated deaths from Puerto Rico’s hurricane on the Trump administration, as if the storm itself took nobody.

A take a look at a number of the current claims:


TRUMP: “‘Middle-Class Income Hits All-Time High!’ @foxandfriends And will continue to rise (unless the Dems get in and destroy what we have built).” — tweet Thursday.

VICE PRESIDENT MIKE PENCE: “Just today, if you hadn’t heard about it yet, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that, last year, middle-class incomes in America hit an all-time high — that’s worth celebrating — for working families.” — remarks Wednesday in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

THE FACTS: These assertions are an instance of how Trump and different administration officers typically search credit score for developments in place earlier than they took workplace. Trump’s personal Census Bureau additionally forged doubt on the claims.

Median U.S. family revenue — the extent at which half of the U.S. inhabitants earns extra and half much less — grew 5.1 % in 2015 and three.1 % in 2016, through the Obama administration. It was the quickest two-year progress on report, courting to 1967. In 2017, Trump’s first yr in workplace, median revenue grew at a slower tempo of 1.eight % to succeed in what technically was an all-time excessive, adjusted for inflation, of $61,372.

The Census Bureau, nevertheless, warned in its report Wednesday that after adjusting for modifications in its methodology in 2013, final yr’s determine was not truly an all-time excessive. As an alternative, it remained barely under 1999’s degree of $61,966, although the bureau famous that the distinction was minor.

OBAMA: “And by the time I left office, household income was near its all-time high.” — rally Sept. 7 on the College of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

THE FACTS: That’s true, although it was a very long time coming. In accordance with the Census Bureau, in 2016 the standard family earned $59,039, adjusted for inflation, almost matching the height it reached in 1999. One other approach of taking a look at these figures, in fact, is that the U.S. center class primarily went 17 years, Obama’s two phrases included, and not using a increase.


TRUMP: “We’re building the wall, not only building it, we’ve already started it. We’ve started the wall. $1.6 billion last year, $1.6 billion this year, we’re rapidly in San Diego and other parts of the country. We’re picking the locations that are worse.” — remarks Sept. 7 at fundraising occasion in South Dakota.

THE FACTS: Trump’s suggestion that he secured $three.2 billion for development of a wall alongside the united statesMexico border is improper. Neither is the development underway including any mileage to what’s already in place.

Congress allotted $1.6 billion for the wall and associated safety measures this yr. The administration requested a further $1.6 billion subsequent yr so as to add 65 miles (104 kilometers) of wall in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley however has not acquired any of it. Legislative leaders within the Home and Senate pledged settlement this previous week on a short-term spending invoice that may not tackle wall cash. GOP leaders have stated they most popular to resolve the difficulty after the Nov. 6 elections.

Trump is right that wall development is underway in San Diego — in addition to Santa Teresa, New Mexico, and Calexico, California — nevertheless it replaces or fortifies present obstacles. Limitations presently blanket 654 miles (1,046 kilometers), or roughly one-third of the border with Mexico, a lot of it constructed beneath President George W. Bush.

The $1.6 billion that Congress approved this yr got here with a situation that the wall should adhere to present designs. Final yr, the administration constructed eight prototypes in San Diego that have been meant to information future development.


TRUMP: “3000 people did not die in the two hurricanes that hit Puerto Rico. When I left the Island, AFTER the storm had hit, they had anywhere from 6 to 18 deaths. As time went by it did not go up by much. Then, a long time later, they started to report really large numbers, like 3000….” ”This was completed by the Democrats as a way to make me look as dangerous as attainable once I was efficiently elevating Billions of Dollars to assist rebuild Puerto Rico. If an individual died for any purpose, like previous age, simply add them onto the listing. Dangerous politics. I really like Puerto Rico!” –tweets Thursday.

THE FACTS: He’s making a baseless assertion that large deaths didn’t occur, even when the precise toll from the hurricane stays imprecise.

Unbiased researchers at George Washington College estimated 2,975 extra deaths associated to Hurricane Maria within the six months following the hurricane, which hit final September. Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rossello commissioned the research and accepted the death toll as one of the best out there. Rossello rejected the findings of a special research that estimated greater than four,000 died, saying he discovered the GWU analysis with its decrease quantity to be scientifically sound.

The research discovered that 22 % extra individuals died than would have been anticipated throughout that interval in a yr with out the storm. Its central discovering has been roughly corroborated by different, comparable research. A second part will look at the circumstances of particular deaths to reach at a extra exact quantity.

The lead researcher on the research was Dr. Carlos Santos-Burgoa, a well known professional in international well being, notably Latin America.

Trump’s declare that the death toll was not more than 18 when he visited Puerto Rico, almost two weeks after the storm, ignores the truth that the U.S. territory’s official death toll was raised to 34 later that day, Oct. three. After that, it climbed to 64. With providers devastated, most energy out, many individuals determined for meals and water and roads impassable, it was unimaginable to know what number of died instantly from Maria or from floodwaters or deprivation in its fast aftermath.

That’s why the official death toll remained comparatively low till researchers might look at death data and achieve a broader understanding of individuals’s circumstances.

It took years to evaluate the death toll from Hurricane Katrina in 2005 regardless of the relative accessibility of the Gulf Coast, for instance. About 1,800 died from Katrina.

Trump was a one-man island in attributing the Puerto Rican death estimate to Democrats. Home Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., noticed “no reason to dispute” the estimate. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., tweeted his help of the three,000 discovering and lamented that “These days even tragedy becomes political.” A number of different Republican lawmakers from Florida equally rejected Trump’s phrases. Democrats have been outraged.

TRUMP: “We got A Pluses for our recent hurricane work in Texas and Florida (and did an unappreciated great job in Puerto Rico, even though an inaccessible island with very poor electricity and a totally incompetent Mayor of San Juan).” — tweet Wednesday.

TRUMP: “I think Puerto Rico was incredibly successful. Puerto Rico was, actually, our toughest one of all because it’s an island … Everything is by boat …The job that FEMA and law enforcement and everybody did, working along with the Governor in Puerto Rico, I think was tremendous. I think that Puerto Rico was an incredible, unsung success.” — remarks Tuesday.

THE FACTS: Trump’s declare that the federal authorities had an “incredibly successful” response to Maria is questionable.

The storm is estimated to be one of many nation’s worst disasters, after the U.S. territory raised its official death toll from 64 to 2,975 based mostly on the GWU research. That surpasses the 1,800 individuals who died from Hurricane Katrina. Maria can also be estimated to have brought about $100 billion in injury.

A July report by the Federal Emergency Administration Company famous a number of shortcomings in its response, together with that it underestimated how a lot meals and water can be wanted after the storm and that not sufficient Spanish-speaking assist staff have been deployed to the island.

Responding to Trump’s feedback, Rossello disputed the notion that the response was “successful.”

Blackouts nonetheless stay widespread; almost 60,000 houses are coated by solely a makeshift roof not able to withstanding a Class 1 hurricane; and 13 % of municipalities lack secure telephone or web service.

In Maria’s aftermath, in response to FEMA knowledge analyzed by the AP, approvals for particular person help checks in Puerto Rico have been slower in contrast with what occurred with giant storms final yr. From Sept. 30 to Oct. 7, not a type of checks was permitted. On Oct. eight the approvals started rolling once more, however with a big spike suggesting a backlog.

As well as, knowledge from the U.S. Small Enterprise Administration point out that approvals for catastrophe loans in Puerto Rico have been sluggish — the primary one was not authorised till 15 days after the storm was declared, 4 occasions so long as with Hurricane Harvey.

DEMOCRATIC SEN. ROBERT MENENDEZ of New Jersey: “You’re right, Mr. President. The Hurricane didn’t kill 3,000 people. Your botched response did.” — tweet Thursday.

THE FACTS: He’s taking it too far. Regardless of the shortcomings of the federal response, attributing a selected death toll to that alone is unsupported. FEMA confronted some issues that have been past its management, principally the sheer drive of the Class four monster storm in addition to the logistical difficulties of reaching the Caribbean island, greater than 1,000 miles from the U.S. mainland.

Residents have been crucial of the hurricane response by native officers, not simply by Washington. Puerto Rico’s authorities has acknowledged that its emergency plans have been designed just for a Class 1 hurricane, and admitted failures to comply with these plans and communications breakdowns.


TRUMP: “The GDP rate (4.2 percent) is higher than the Unemployment Rate (3.9 percent) for the first time in over 100 years!” — tweet Monday.

WHITE HOUSE ECONOMIC ADVISER KEVIN HASSETT: “The correct number is 10 years.” — briefing Monday.

THE FACTS: Truly, the right quantity is 12 years. Within the first three months of 2006, the financial system expanded at a 5.four % annual price. On the similar time, the unemployment fee was four.7 %.

The financial system’s progress fee, which reached four.2 % within the April-June quarter, has been greater than the unemployment price dozens of occasions since World Conflict II. Hassett acknowledged Trump’s tweet was flawed.

HASSETT: “There was an inflection at the election of Donald Trump, and … a whole bunch of data items started heading north.” — briefing Monday.

THE FACTS: Should you take a look at a chart of month-to-month job positive factors or the financial system’s progress price, that inflection level is tough to identify. Hassett notably didn’t embrace in his presentation any point out of general job creation or the broadest measurement of the financial system’s output, GDP.

That’s in all probability as a result of the expansion fee Trump repeatedly cites, the four.2 % enlargement at an annual price that occurred within the April-June quarter, isn’t out of line with Obama’s document. The financial system grew extra shortly than that 4 occasions throughout Obama’s eight years in workplace.

Economists usually acknowledge that progress has accelerated this yr in contrast with 2016 and 2017, and most of them partly credit score final yr’s tax cuts for fueling extra shopper and enterprise spending. The financial system is on tempo to develop at a three % or quicker tempo in 2018, which might be the primary time since 2005 it will attain that mark.

But it barely missed that cutoff in 2015, when it expanded 2.9 % beneath Obama.

With regards to jobs, the U.S. added extra jobs in every of the final three years of Obama’s presidency, 2014-2016, than it did final yr, Trump’s first in workplace. Job progress has picked up a bit this yr however continues to be on monitor to return in under the 2014-2015 tempo.

OBAMA: “The actions we took during that crisis returned the economy to healthy growth and initiated the longest streak of job creation on record.” — rally Sept. 7 on the College of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

THE FACTS: He’s proper on jobs, however whether or not the financial system skilled “healthy growth” is a matter of dispute.

As measured by the gross home product, the broadest measure of the financial system’s output, the U.S. financial system expanded at a mean annual price of two.2 % from 2010, after the Nice Recession ended, by means of 2016, Obama’s final yr in workplace. That’s the weakest progress of any post-recession restoration since World Struggle II.

OBAMA: “When the job numbers come out, the monthly job numbers, and suddenly Republicans are saying it’s a miracle, I have to kind of remind them, actually, those job numbers are the same as they were in 2015 and 2016.” — Illinois rally.

THE FACTS: Obama is right, although many economists are stunned that hiring has continued at such a strong tempo after greater than 9 years of enlargement. Job features even picked up a bit in 2018.

Nonetheless, in 2015 employers added a mean of 226,000 jobs a month. Final yr, Trump’s first within the White Home, that determine fell to 182,000 a month. To date in 2018, hiring has are available a bit higher, averaging 207,000 a month.

In some methods, Obama isn’t giving himself sufficient credit score: The strongest yr for job progress because the recession was 2014, when employers added greater than 250,000 on common each month.

Related Press writers Christopher Rugaber and Lauran Neergaard in Washington and Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed to this report.



White Home charts:


Discover AP Reality Checks at

Comply with @APFactCheck on Twitter: